Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2000
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasacharya, D.-
dc.contributor.authorRamana Murthy, J.V.-
dc.contributor.authorVenugopalam, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-05T09:19:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-05T09:19:30Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citation10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00027-1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2000-
dc.descriptionNITWen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the context of global climate negotiations various approaches have been proposed to distribute commitments regarding greenhouse gas emissions mitigation over di!erent countries. One of them is the Triptych approach, which is a sector approach that accounts for di!erences in national circumstances such as population size and growth, standard of living, economic structure and fuel mix in power generation. It was successfully applied in the negotiations on di!erentiation of commitments in the European Union in 1997. In this study we aim to see what problems we encounter when applying the approach in a wider geographical context. In order to reach this aim we establish a test di!erentiation of CO emission reduction obligations for a selection of 48 countries. The criteria we apply comprise technical emission reduction options only. According to our Triptych criteria, including the choice for particular growth scenarios and a convergence of CO emissions in the domesticsec tors by the year 2030, the sum of CO emissions in the 48 countries in 2015 is estimated to increase by 8% over 1990 levels. With the criteria used the average reduction objective for the OECD will be somewhere between !10% and !20%. For economies in transition to a market economy our calculations indicate on average a reduction between !30% and !50%. For the developing countries we established increases varying roughly from #40% to#200%. The choice for a particular growth scenario as well as the assumption for the period for the convergence of per capita emissions in the domestic sectors are crucial and may e!ect the outcome of the calculations to a large extent. If these problems can be su$ciently solved the Triptych approach can serve as a valuable tool to rank countries in a global di!erentiation scheme. 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEnergy Policyen_US
dc.subjectDi!erentiation of commitmentsen_US
dc.subjectNational circumstancesen_US
dc.subjectTriptych approachen_US
dc.titleDifferentiating commitments world wide: Global differentiation of GHG emissions reductions based on the Triptych approach - A preliminary assessmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Mathematics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0301421501000271-main.pdf346.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.