Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1111
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorP. Anand Raj and, D. Nagesh Kumar-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-25T05:14:00Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-25T05:14:00Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.citation10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00091-2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1111-
dc.description.abstractThe methodology proposed by Anand Raj and Nagesh Kumar [5] to rank the river basin planning and development alternatives under multi-criterion environment using fuzzy numbers is applied to a case study. The purpose is to find the most suitable planning of reservoirs with their associated purposes aimed at the development of one of the major peninsular river basins (Krishna river basin) in India. A set of 7 alternative systems with 8 main objectives, which are further subdivided into 18 criteria, are considered for ordering or ranking them employing the opinion (preference structure) of three experts: an acadamician, a field engineer and an official from Ministry of Water Resources, using fuzzy numbers. The fuzzy weights (wl) of alternatives (Ai) are computed using standard fuzzy arithmetic. The concepts of maximizing set and minimizing set are introduced to decide total utility or order value of each of the alternativesen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNITWen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen_US
dc.subjectBasin planningen_US
dc.subjectDecision makingen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy numbersen_US
dc.subjectMaximizing seten_US
dc.titleRanking multi-criterion river basin planning alternatives using fuzzy numbersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Civil Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0165011497000912-main.pdf554.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.